404


ERROR 404 - PAGE NOT FOUND
Oops! Looks like the page you're looking for was moved or never existed.
Make sure you typed the correct URL or followed a valid link.

Google
 

We recommend you load this web site using Firefox.

All the money from this page is donated to charity. Click here if you wish to change this page.

Search
   


   

I recently came across an old Fortune magazine from 1998. Interesting reading–especially the ads. Behind the front page, Compaq had a full-page spread promoting a brand new laptop. Key selling points:

  • Intel Mobile Pentium II processor @ 266 MHz
  • Industry-leading AGP implementation with a dedicated 66 MHz graphics bus and 4 MB SGRAM video memory (I have no idea what an AGP implementation is and, unsurprisingly, there is no explanation within the ad)
  • 5 GB hard drive
  • 64 MB RAM
  • 33.6 Kbps modem
  • All yours for the low price of $5,399!

We’ve come a long way since then–today, for $600, you can buy a low-end Dell laptop with a 1.5 Ghz processor, 256 MB RAM, and a 40 GB hard drive.

In the same magazine, just a few pages after the Compaq ad, I found another full page spread for a Ford Taurus. The bullet points:

  • 100,000 miles between tune-ups
  • Second generation dual airbags
  • Safety cell construction (I don’t know what this means)
  • Speed-sensitive power steering

Hmm. Looks like what you might see if you went to a Ford dealership today.

Of course, others have already compared the auto and PC industries. You may remember an old email joke:

At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated: “If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving twenty-five dollar cars that got 1000 miles to the
gallon.”

In response to Bill’s comments, General Motors issued a press release stating (by Mr. Welch himself): If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason whatsoever your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines on the road you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally your car would die on the freeway for no reason, and you would just accept this, restart and drive on.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn, would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.

5. Only one person at a time could use the car, unless you bought “Car95″ or “CarNT.” But then you would have to buy more seats.

6. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, reliable, five times as fast, and twice as easy to drive, but would only run on five per cent of the roads.

7. The oil, water temperature and alternator warning lights would be replaced by a single “general car default” warning light.

8. New seats would force everyone to have the same size butt.

9. The airbag system would say “Are you sure?” before going off.

10. Occasionally for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key, and grab hold of the radio antenna.

11. GM would require all car buyers to also purchase a deluxe set of Rand McNally road maps (now a GM subsidiary), even though they neither need them nor want them. Attempting to delete this option would immediately cause the car’s performance to diminish by 50% or more. Moreover, GM would become a target for investigation by the Justice Department.

12. Everytime GM introduced a new model car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

13. You’d press the “start” button to shut off the engine.

8 Responses to “Computers Vs. Cars”

heard that joke years ago. But in today’s $3.00 per gallon environment, I don’t find the GM jokes funny.

My link above gives my 2006 predictions, including $100.00 per barrel oil, (it’s about $77.00 this week) the comment shows that I think it’s a 50/50 chance we’ll have $90.00 barrel by july first,

Now. in the Joke,

Gates says…snip…kept up with the computer industry we would all be driving $25.00 cars, at 1,000 miles/gallon
GM said..snip…Every time they repainted the lines on road buy a new car. *Okay, at $25.00 each!

Oh, and my 2001 Honda Oddessy (piece of Total CRAP!), made in canada, my first and last honda ever!

I was driving on the Garden State Parkway, I got on (live 10 mins from parkway). I noticed after I got on the highway I was going 120 MPH.
I also noticed my digital odometer, was not lit, it had —- across all the digits. I also noticed that my speed did not register.
I pulled into the first service area, and REBOOTED by car.
I shut the engine off, counted to 20, and re-started (and hapilly) all was ok, and the speedometer worked again.

Scary shit!

[…] Dan Grossman quoted a hilarious email on his blog yesterday which brought a ray of sunshine into my otherwise overcast day.  To quote a quote: At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated: “If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving twenty-five dollar cars that got 1000 miles to the gallon.” […]

links from Technorati Original post:Computers Vs. Cars by at Google Blog Search: cars

links from Technorati Original post:Computers Vs. Cars by at Google Blog Search: road maps

1968 oldmobile delta 88 rocks!!!:}

Kramer auto Pingback[…] Här finns den återgiven: http://www.aventureforth.com/2006/04/25/computers-vs-cars/_________________/Janne E Jaguar XJ6 Series 1 -70 2.8 manuell med O.D. […]

chasing cars advertising [url=http://myblog.es/bulex]chasing dog cars[/url]

Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! hsfrceynjy

Something to say?