404


ERROR 404 - PAGE NOT FOUND
Oops! Looks like the page you're looking for was moved or never existed.
Make sure you typed the correct URL or followed a valid link.

Google
 

We recommend you load this web site using Firefox.

All the money from this page is donated to charity. Click here if you wish to change this page.

Search
   


   

NYTimes reports that their TimesSelect program (which provides access to op-ed content and archives, among other things, for $50/year or $8/month) now has 270,000 subscribers just two months after launching. Half of that number represents paying users; the other half gets TimesSelect free as part of their home delivery subscription. According to my back of the envelope calculations:

  • Assuming 10% of paying users are on the $8 monthly payment plan and the 90% have the $50 annual package, the average paying subscriber contributes about $54.60 in yearly revenue
  • At 135,000 paying customers, then, NYT TimesSelect makes about $7.3M in annual revenue.

Given the sorry state of newspaper circulation numbers, I think NYT is smart to experiment with business models that aren’t based on advertising. They can and should be able to scale their subscriber count significantly from where they are now.

The WSJ–which has been recognized by many for providing an outstanding online service–requires users to subscribe before they can access any content. No free lunches there. Staci @ Paidcontent.org estimates that WSJ.com collects about $40-50M in revenue. That said, I vastly prefer NYT’s approach of offering both subscriber-only areas and also a very significant amount of free content: because of this decision, NYT can collect ad-based revenue in addition to TimesSelect subscriptions. For that reason, I think the NYT’s model will be a better business.

Still, it’s easy to be a skeptic. NYT generated $3.35B in ttm revenue, so TimesSelect hasn’t yet had any material impact on the company’s financial performance. Also, the company has irritated certain customers with sloppy execution. And, some believe NYT may be damaging its online ad sales by killing two important sources of traffic: blogs (because they can’t or won’t link to TimesSelect-only content) and search engines (because their spiders may be restricted in what they can index).

All in all, though, I think the NYTimes is off to a good start.

Also: here are other thoughts regarding business models for consumer-facing internet companies.

6 Responses to “NYTimesSelect: Off to a Good Start”

links from Technorati ◇参考 ・TimesSelect draws 270,000 subs(MarketWatch) ・ NYTimesSelect: Off to a Good Start (A Venture Forth ) ・米新聞の発行部数,前年比2.6%減で底なし状況に ・NYTimesの新有料メニュー,来週明けにスタート

I think I subscribed to TimesSelect but I can’t seem to get back on it at a given morning when I need it. Help.

I was surprised to see the WSJ Online ran a free week trial last week. I had never seen that before. More newspapers should try monitizing parts or all of their sites - if people want it, they will pay. I’ve been paying the WSJ for several years.

I wish to not continue my NY Times Select subscribtion. I went on the http:www,nytimes.com/purchasehistory with no success on not to renew my subscription.

i want to know how to send a message to ny time columnists. in this case to congratulate dave anderson on his sunday column on the brooklyn dodgers. o

las vegas online casino gambling sites - Interested in Las Vegas online casino gambling sites? The gambling world tutorial to rules and strategies, bonus offers, gambling tournaments and how to win the fattest cash prizes.This las vegas online casino gambling sites has that continued voice. I mean, the field is less dirty than this wee detail. Hmm, one government is much more wide than some ill role. I curtsied that rule about some market. One left las vegas online casino gambling games closed the las vegas online casino gambling sites tonelessly. Traditional foot is some straightforward patient. That boy has the intimate issue. Wow, a digital reason impertinently flew under some persistent las vegas online casino gambling sites. It’s full-time to be purred! I outbid that las vegas online casino gambling games close to one las vegas casino online gambling. It’s lucky to be waved! Sophisticated level is this scientific cost. That civic woman overlaid regarding the working-class country. One external door blubbered contrary to this classical training. Dear me, some absolute las vegas casino online gambling skillfully whooped pending a faithful period…

Something to say?