<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AOL for Sale?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aventureforth.com/2005/10/13/35/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aventureforth.com/2005/10/13/35/</link>
	<description>Ideas about venture capital, investing, technology, and policy.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:46:26 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The San Diego Million Dollar Webpage - Own a part of the internet!</title>
		<link>http://www.aventureforth.com/2005/10/13/35/comment-page-1/#comment-57979</link>
		<dc:creator>The San Diego Million Dollar Webpage - Own a part of the internet!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 07:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aventureforth.com/?p=35#comment-57979</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] In an earlier post, I predicted that MSFT would win a deal with AOL (or buy it outright). Looks like I was wrong&#8211;Google appears to have emerged as the victor, as the NYTimes, among others, now reports. According to Saul Hansell&#8217;s article, Time Warner will announce tomorrow that AOL will renew its three-year old partnership defining how Google powers AOL&#8217;s search functionality. [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-ref-pre%-->[...] In an earlier post, I predicted that MSFT would win a deal with AOL (or buy it outright). Looks like I was wrong&#8211;Google appears to have emerged as the victor, as the NYTimes, among others, now reports. According to Saul Hansell&#8217;s article, Time Warner will announce tomorrow that AOL will renew its three-year old partnership defining how Google powers AOL&#8217;s search functionality. [...]<!--%kramer-ref-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phentermine</title>
		<link>http://www.aventureforth.com/2005/10/13/35/comment-page-1/#comment-34228</link>
		<dc:creator>Phentermine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aventureforth.com/?p=35#comment-34228</guid>
		<description>Nice design, good graphical content. I think I&#039;ll come back later again;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice design, good graphical content. I think I&#8217;ll come back later again;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sopoq</title>
		<link>http://www.aventureforth.com/2005/10/13/35/comment-page-1/#comment-3470</link>
		<dc:creator>Sopoq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 05:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aventureforth.com/?p=35#comment-3470</guid>
		<description>Good job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Grossman</title>
		<link>http://www.aventureforth.com/2005/10/13/35/comment-page-1/#comment-215</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Grossman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aventureforth.com/?p=35#comment-215</guid>
		<description>Nivi,

I suppose the sort of AOL-Google partnership you describe could work, but given Google&#039;s sensitivity to culture (think about their hiring process, which is notoriously rigorous, even for junior positions) I think it is a longshot.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nivi,</p>
<p>I suppose the sort of AOL-Google partnership you describe could work, but given Google&#8217;s sensitivity to culture (think about their hiring process, which is notoriously rigorous, even for junior positions) I think it is a longshot.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nivi</title>
		<link>http://www.aventureforth.com/2005/10/13/35/comment-page-1/#comment-214</link>
		<dc:creator>Nivi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 08:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aventureforth.com/?p=35#comment-214</guid>
		<description>Regarding cultural differences, could AOL be run  essentially as a seperate business entity for now with a few orders like &quot;use Google search&quot; and &quot;interoperate with GTalk&quot;? Why integrate other than for financial reporting and compliance with laws? Yes there are lots of issues but could this work?

As far as comps go: EBay just dropped $4B on a pretty small IM network when you compare it to AOL&#039;s. This is no reason to do a deal but it does show you what people will pay for these networks. These networks are worth a lot because they are closed. Although Google is commited to an open IM network, the GTalk-AIM network will be effectively closed because there will be no one left to federate with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding cultural differences, could AOL be run  essentially as a seperate business entity for now with a few orders like &#8220;use Google search&#8221; and &#8220;interoperate with GTalk&#8221;? Why integrate other than for financial reporting and compliance with laws? Yes there are lots of issues but could this work?</p>
<p>As far as comps go: EBay just dropped $4B on a pretty small IM network when you compare it to AOL&#8217;s. This is no reason to do a deal but it does show you what people will pay for these networks. These networks are worth a lot because they are closed. Although Google is commited to an open IM network, the GTalk-AIM network will be effectively closed because there will be no one left to federate with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Burton's Feed Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.aventureforth.com/2005/10/13/35/comment-page-1/#comment-264</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Burton's Feed Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aventureforth.com/?p=35#comment-264</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;  Is AOL for Sale?   I don&#039;t know but plenty of speculation is happening.  I hope Microsoft buys AOL. This would be the last nail in their coffin (and it couldn&#039;t have happened to a worse company).   Merging with Google would destroy the company. Google should just stay&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--%kramer-pre%-->  Is AOL for Sale?   I don&#8217;t know but plenty of speculation is happening.  I hope Microsoft buys AOL. This would be the last nail in their coffin (and it couldn&#8217;t have happened to a worse company).   Merging with Google would destroy the company. Google should just stay<!--%kramer-post%--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
