Comments on: A VC’s Perspective on Web 2.0

By: music downloads pc

music downloads pc — Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:11:57 +0000

Hi, there!..1eeec4ffc6f9ed88a9ed59e9cc34b9d1

By: forex.forexforbeginners

forex.forexforbeginners — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 15:03:21 +0000

[...] [...] unbelievable site now go over this occurence http://www.aventureforth.com/2005/09/15/a-vcs-perspective-on-web-20/ and give comments [...] [...]

By: Learn to Trade the Forex

Learn to Trade the Forex — Sat, 03 Mar 2007 11:09:40 +0000

Great theme and design. Keep-up the good work. Thanks! Learn about the Forex market before you start trading..learn to trade the forex

By: WebDB - Detail View

WebDB - Detail View — Sat, 25 Feb 2006 20:37:02 +0000

[...] WebDB – Detail View Options Telecommunity Exchange Public WebProducts Portfolio Technology and Science Advanced Search Technology and Science This item with ID 11064 is part of the public WebDB named Technology and Science – Add Feedback Web 2.0 business models 18/12/2005 – 19:51:18 There are a variety of viable options. Ads can drive a reasonable revenue stream, but it can be difficult to scale ad revenue without very significant traffic levels. Certain companies with stunning user growth, like MySpace, can make the math work. Most companies, though, may find it necessary to adopt an additional fee strategy to round out the business. A challenge here is that consumers have largely been conditioned to believe content is free. It will be interesting to see how NYTimes’ TimeSelect program fares (they are about to start charging $40/year for access to certain content and archives). Separately, transaction charges for product sales can work (see Connected Ventures, which manages CollegeHumor), but this can be challenging as consumer tastes change rapidly (creating inventory management issues). I probably prefer subscription-models. Once a company has exclusive access to a valuable asset, customers will often be willing to pay recurring fees, particularly if the asset improves over time. Zoominfo (we are investors) is a good example–they have a strong and growing business based on for-fee access to premium search tools and data.Original Location: http://www.aventureforth.com/2005/09/15/a-vcs-perspective-on-web-20/ Keywords: business model web2 Related WebDB Items that share at least one of the item’s keywords. 2 related items were found. (1 to 2 shown) SlideShow ID Title Keywords Last Update 11068 Web 2.0 integration web2 18/12/2005 – 19:06:06 11067 Web 2.0 – platform, technologies, business models web2 18/12/2005 – 19:29:57 Telecommunity wide Keyword Search You can also search for the following keywords in all public Telecommunity WebDB Items: business · model · web2 · [...]

By: Pranav

Pranav — Sun, 09 Oct 2005 22:47:53 +0000

I dont really comprehend the business model that will go along with the deluge of the so-called ‘web 2.0′ related companies. If you just talk about tagging / folksonomy, there are some 8-10 clones of del.icio.us. A couple of these will probably get picked up by the behemoths..The others will vanish into oblivion? Besides…how many of these sites / services are actually used by the non-tech-savvy consumer ?
By far..however this is one of the best articles I have come across about the ‘Web 2.0′ mania.

By: cyberTao

cyberTao — Sun, 09 Oct 2005 09:53:30 +0000

good work!
Management team is the key point to success.
other point are the extention of the team.

By: Frode Hegland

Frode Hegland — Tue, 04 Oct 2005 22:51:25 +0000

Some very good points here. Would you consider hyperwords to be a Web 2.0 component? http://www.hyperwords.net

By: ITNorthWest Voice

ITNorthWest Voice — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

A Venture Forth � Blog Archive � A VC’s Perspective on Web 2.0 An insinghtful piece from a VC looking into the web2.0 space….

By: KBCafe tag search for ajax

KBCafe tag search for ajax — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

Link: http://www.aventureforth.com/2005/09/15/a-vcs-perspective-on-web-20/

By: AjaxDeveloper.org

AjaxDeveloper.org — Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000

He breaks it down into relevant sections/requirements, including: “Management team”, “Technology/product”, “Business model”, and “Capital requirements”. It’s interesting to see what it’s like from “the other side” rather than looking just through the eyes of a programmer/developer…